Research finds insufficient data transparency for FDA-cleared AI devices in Alzheimer’s imaging, raising bias and generalizability concerns.
Key Details
- 124 AI/ML-based devices for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) were FDA-authorized between January 2015 and December 2024.
- 291.7% (22/24) were cleared via the 510(k) pathway; 8.3% (2/24) through de novo classification.
- 3For 12 devices, there was no info on training or validation data in FDA summaries or peer-reviewed articles.
- 4Only 2 FDA summaries (8.3%) included external validation data; 10 peer-reviewed articles (41.7%) provided such data.
- 5Reporting of disease status, age, sex, race, and ethnicity was rare across most devices; demographic transparency was lacking.
- 6Most devices (21) were reviewed by radiology panels and primarily involved MRI and PET imaging.
Why It Matters
Transparent disclosure of training and validation data, especially demographic details, is vital for assessing bias and clinical accuracy in AI-based imaging devices. Without sufficient data transparency, there is uncertainty about the generalizability and safety of these AI tools in real-world, diverse patient populations.
Source
AuntMinnie
Related News
•Radiology Business
Meta Funds Ohio State’s Radiology AI Innovation Projects
Meta will fund Ohio State researchers to explore AI-driven advancements in radiology, including chest X-ray reporting and disease prediction.
•AuntMinnie
AI Triage Tool Speeds Up ICH Head CT Turnaround in ED
AI-based triage for intracranial hemorrhage on head CT reduced emergency department report turnaround by 13 minutes.
•AuntMinnie
ChatGPT-5 Performs Poorly at Detecting Distal Radius Fractures on X-rays
ChatGPT-5 missed about half of distal radius fractures on x-rays, showing limited diagnostic capability in a real-world scenario.