AI and radiologists differ in the types and patient characteristics of false-positive findings in digital breast tomosynthesis breast cancer screening.
Key Details
- 1Study included 2,977 women (average age 58) and 3,183 DBT exams (2013–2017) from UCLA.
- 2AI-only false positives mostly flagged benign calcifications (40%), while radiologists mostly flagged masses (47%).
- 3AI and radiologists had nearly identical false-positive rates: 9.7% (AI) vs. 9.5% (radiologists).
- 4Of 541 false-positive exams, 43% were AI-only, 44% were radiologist-only, and 13% were flagged by both.
- 5AI-only false positives occurred in older women (average 60 years), less often with dense breasts (24%), and more often with prior surgical history (37%).
- 6Concordant (AI-radiologist) flagged findings needing biopsy were high-risk in 44% of cases.
Why It Matters
Identifying how AI and radiologists differ in false-positive findings can inform the design of AI tools to improve screening specificity and reduce unnecessary recalls, directly impacting efficiency and patient care in breast imaging.
Source
AuntMinnie
Related News
•Radiology Business
Real-World Study: Radiology AI Best in Emergency and Inpatient Settings
A commercial AI tool for intracranial aneurysm detection outperformed in inpatient and emergency settings but yielded limited benefits for outpatients in a major health system study.
•Radiology Business
New Rubric Enhances Safety of AI-Generated Radiology Summaries
Researchers developed a five-factor rubric to assess the safety and quality of AI-generated, patient-friendly radiology report summaries.
•Radiology Business
UCLA Review Evaluates Breast AI for Early Cancer Detection
A UCLA-led review analyzes current evidence for AI tools in screening mammography, focusing on their capability to detect interval cancers.