AI and radiologists differ in the types and patient characteristics of false-positive findings in digital breast tomosynthesis breast cancer screening.
Key Details
- 1Study included 2,977 women (average age 58) and 3,183 DBT exams (2013–2017) from UCLA.
- 2AI-only false positives mostly flagged benign calcifications (40%), while radiologists mostly flagged masses (47%).
- 3AI and radiologists had nearly identical false-positive rates: 9.7% (AI) vs. 9.5% (radiologists).
- 4Of 541 false-positive exams, 43% were AI-only, 44% were radiologist-only, and 13% were flagged by both.
- 5AI-only false positives occurred in older women (average 60 years), less often with dense breasts (24%), and more often with prior surgical history (37%).
- 6Concordant (AI-radiologist) flagged findings needing biopsy were high-risk in 44% of cases.
Why It Matters
Identifying how AI and radiologists differ in false-positive findings can inform the design of AI tools to improve screening specificity and reduce unnecessary recalls, directly impacting efficiency and patient care in breast imaging.
Source
AuntMinnie
Related News
•Radiology Business
AI-Powered Tool Streamlines CT Scan Prioritization in Emergency Departments
An AI-based CT queue system significantly reduces wait times for ED patients by prioritizing scans likely to reveal critical findings.
•Radiology Business
AI Workflow Enables General Radiologists to Match Breast Specialists in Screening
AI-powered workflow helps generalist radiologists detect breast cancer at rates comparable to specialists.
•Radiology Business
LLMs Automate Radiology Report Quality Control, Study Finds
LLM-based systems can rapidly automate radiology report quality control, saving significant manual review time.