Deep learning for cardiac CT segmentation for congenital heart disease: A systematic review.
Authors
Affiliations (3)
Affiliations (3)
- Engineering for Health Research Centre, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
- Aston Institute of Health & Neurodevelopment, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
- School of Computer Science and Digital Technologies, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Deep Learning (DL) has transformed cardiac image segmentation, yet its application to congenital heart disease (CHD) remains underexplored, with no prior systematic review in this emerging domain. This review evaluates current DL approaches for CHD CT segmentation, identifies best performing model architectures, assesses quality of reporting and highlights challenges for clinical implementation. Following PRISMA guidelines, six databases: PubMed, IEEE Xplore, MDPI, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched (2004-2025). Extracted characteristics include source of dataset, ground truth labelling approach, DL architecture and evaluation methods. Reporting quality was evaluated using the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical imaging (CLAIM). 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, reflecting the emergence of this research area. The UNet architecture and its variants dominated (8 studies). The highest reported Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) for cardiac structures segmentation was achieved utilising an advanced hybrid ResNet-based model (Aorta, DSC = 0.945). Well documented areas include the training approach (12 studies) and model description (all). Only two studies performed external validation, and two assessed inter- and intra-rater variability. No studies reported sample size determination and handing of missing data. Small vascular structures consistently underperformed compared to whole heart segmentation. Deep learning models show strong potential for CHD CT segmentation but remain limited by small datasets, inconsistent reporting and lack of clinical evaluation. Advancing this field requires multidisciplinary collaboration, standardised reporting, and integration of clinical co- design. As the first comprehensive review in this area, we provide a strong baseline for evaluating future studies.