Back to all papers

Patient-specific biophysical AI-powered modeling for predicting RFA volumes in HCC.

November 3, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Audigier C,Akkari FG,Meister F,Tonglet A,Maréchal B,Frings O,Duran R

Affiliations (4)

  • Siemens Healthineers, Swiss Innovation Hub, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Siemens Healthineers, Digital Technologies and Innovation, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. [email protected].

Abstract

To clinically evaluate a fully automated, artificial intelligence-powered, patient-specific biophysical model for predicting radiofrequency ablation (RFA) volumes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to compare its performance with manufacturer-provided ablation estimates. This retrospective study included 96 RFA procedures in 65 HCC patients treated using a single ablation with a cluster needle. Tumors, needle position, and postablation zone were manually segmented on periprocedural computed tomography. Liver parenchyma and vascular structures were automatically extracted using deep learning. A graphics processing unit (GPU)-accelerated biophysical model simulated heat transfer, vascular heat-sink effects, and tissue necrosis using patient-specific anatomy and procedural data. Correlations between ablation volume manually segmented and clinical or anatomical parameters (ablation time, ablation tip temperature, tumor-capsule distance, vessel proximity, type, and diameter) were assessed. Model-predicted volumes were compared with ground truth and manufacturer estimates using relative volume difference (RVD) and volume similarity. Final ablation volumes showed wide variability (7.9-78.8 cm³) and were not correlated with any individual clinical or anatomical parameter (Pearson r - 0.02 to 0.29). Across 94 evaluable cases, simulated and ground-truth volumes were similar (p = 0.165), while manufacturer estimates significantly overestimated ablation volume (p < 0.001). The model achieved a median RVD of 0.39 (interquartile range 0.24-0.57), significantly lower than the manufacturer's algorithm (1.04; 0.64-1.61). Incorporating patient-specific ablation time further improved accuracy. Simulation was fast (0.45 s per second of ablation on GPU). A fully automated, patient-specific biophysical model substantially improves RFA ablation volume prediction in HCC compared with manufacturer approximations, supporting its potential role in personalized treatment planning and outcome standardization. Question In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, can a fully automated, AI-powered, patient-specific biophysical model predict radiofrequency ablation volume more accurately than manufacturer-provided estimates? Findings A fully automated, AI-powered biophysical model integrating patient-specific anatomy and vasculature predicted RFA volume significantly better than manufacturer estimates (median relative volume difference (RVD) 0.39 versus 1.04). Relevance statement Accurate ablation volume prediction could support personalized radiofrequency ablation (RFA) planning, reduce reliance on operator experience, and standardize treatment margins in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), potentially improving local tumor control and reducing recurrence in cirrhotic patients undergoing thermal ablation.

Topics

Liver NeoplasmsCarcinoma, HepatocellularRadiofrequency AblationArtificial IntelligenceCatheter AblationJournal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAISlice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.