A multiparametric MRI deep learning framework for automated segmentation and four-category classification of solitary spinal lesions.
Authors
Affiliations (3)
Affiliations (3)
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49, North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100069, China.
- MR Research Center China, GE HealthCare, No.1, Tongji South Road, Daxing District, Beijing, 102600, China.
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49, North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100069, China. [email protected].
Abstract
Accurate preoperative categorization of solitary spinal lesions (SSLs) is important because management differ across lesion categories. This retrospective study included 600 patients with SSLs (332 men, 268 women; median age, 53 years) examined from January 2018 to March 2025 and assigned to training, validation, and test sets using a fixed temporal split. According to histopathology, lesions were categorized as malignant, intermediate, benign, or non-neoplastic. Lesions on CE-T1WI and DWI (b = 50 s/mm²) images from multiple-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (mb-DWI) were segmented using 3D nnU-Net. Two DenseNet-121 models were developed: a structural MRI model (DL_struct) based on co-registered CE-T1WI, T2WI, and T2-FS images, and a mb-DWI model (DL_mb) based on images acquired at b values of 50, 400, and 800 s/mm² and the corresponding ADC maps. Their late fusion yielded an imaging model (DL_fusion). A clinical model based on five clinico-radiological features was built and integrated with DL_fusion to generate the combined model. Performance was compared with five radiologists. In the test cohort, Dice scores were 0.900 for CE-T1WI and 0.857 for DWI (b = 50 s/mm²). The combined model achieved the best four-category classification performance, with a macro-AUC/accuracy of 0.921/0.772, compared with 0.916/0.743 for DL_fusion, 0.852/0.640 for DL_struct, 0.871/0.647 for DL_mb, and 0.721/0.493 for the clinical model. Category-specific AUCs ranged from 0.893 to 0.956. The combined model achieved an accuracy of 0.772, outperforming the junior and attending radiologists (0.588-0.750), although it remained inferior to the senior radiologist (0.853). Model assistance improved reader performance, with the largest gains in junior radiologists. This multimodal DL framework enabled automated segmentation and four-category classification of SSLs and improved the performance of less experienced readers.