Back to all papers

Promise and challenges of heart chamber segmentation from noncontrast CT scans using contrastive unpaired image translation: a feasibility study.

October 26, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Wang J,Yu T,Lu HE,Zeng Z,Leader JK,Meng X,Zhu J,Pu J

Affiliations (3)

  • University of Pittsburgh, Department of Radiology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • University of Pittsburgh, Department of Bioengineering, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • University of Pittsburgh, Department of Ophthalmology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility and challenges of heart chamber segmentation from noncontrast CT scans using contrastive unpaired image translation and deep learning-based segmentation. We developed ChameleonNet, a framework utilizing the Contrastive Unpaired Translation (CUT) network with decoupled contrastive learning (DCL) loss to synthesize noncontrast CT from contrast CT scans. Using annotations of four heart chambers (left atrium (LA), left ventricle (LV), right atrium (RA), and right ventricle (RV)) from contrast scans, we trained a Hausdorff distance loss-enhanced nnU-Net on synthesized noncontrast images. The translation model was trained with 35,538 contrast-enhanced and 37,197 noncontrast CT slices. The segmentation model was trained with 292 synthesized noncontrast scans. Performance was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th Hausdorff distance (HD95) on 36 synthesized noncontrast scans, and volume agreement on 36 real noncontrast CT scans was assessed using Pearson correlation, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and mean percentage error (MPE). The segmentation model achieved DSC of 0.94 ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><mo>±</mo> <mn>0.01</mn></mrow> </math> ), 0.91 ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><mo>±</mo> <mn>0.04</mn></mrow> </math> ), 0.92 ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><mo>±</mo> <mn>0.03</mn></mrow> </math> ), 0.93 ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><mo>±</mo> <mn>0.02</mn></mrow> </math> ), and HD95 of 3.63 ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><mo>±</mo> <mn>1.49</mn></mrow> </math> ), 5.74 ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><mo>±</mo> <mn>4.08</mn></mrow> </math> ), 5.18 ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><mo>±</mo> <mn>1.77</mn></mrow> </math> ), and 5.51 ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><mo>±</mo> <mn>3.21</mn></mrow> </math> ) mm on synthesized noncontrast images for LA, LV, RA, and RV, respectively. On real noncontrast CT scans, Pearson correlations were 0.93, 0.82, 0.87, and 0.89 (all <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn></mrow> </math> ), with MAPE ranging from 9.22% to 20.79%, and MPE ranging from <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>12.52</mn> <mo>%</mo></mrow> </math> to 4.67%. ChameleonNet demonstrated feasibility for heart chamber segmentation from noncontrast CT without manual noncontrast annotations. However, volume errors, particularly for LV and RV, indicate that further refinement and validation are needed before clinical use.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAISlice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.