Back to all papers

The value of <sup>18</sup>F-fluoride PET in bone metastases: an overview.

September 17, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Torricelli C,Nogueira-Lima E,Etchebehere E

Affiliations (2)

  • Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
  • Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil. Electronic address: [email protected].

Abstract

Bone metastases are a major cause of morbidity in patients with advanced cancer, making accurate detection essential for staging, treatment planning, and response assessment. Among molecular imaging techniques, <sup>18</sup>F-sodium fluoride (<sup>18</sup>F-NaF) PET/CT is one of the most sensitive modalities for evaluating osteoblastic skeletal metastases because of its rapid blood clearance and high bone uptake identifying areas of increased bone remodeling associated with metastatic disease. Despite its excellent diagnostic performance, the clinical role of <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT has evolved with the emergence of disease-specific PET radiotracers and advances in hybrid imaging. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the biological basis and imaging principles of <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT, followed by comparison with other imaging modalities, including conventional bone scintigraphy, SPECT/CT, CT, whole-body MRI and other PET/CT tracers, highlighting the advantages and limitations of each modality. Clinical applications of <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastatic disease is discussed across malignancies. Limitations and pitfalls relevant to interpretation and clinical use of <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT are reviewed, including false-positive and false-negative findings, artifacts, the flare phenomenon, cost and limited availability, and radiation dose considerations. Finally, advances in quantitative PET imaging, artificial intelligence, and hybrid imaging are discussed as promising tools to improve the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT. This review highlights the current evidence supporting the use of <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT and discusses its evolving role in the imaging evaluation of bone metastases.

Topics

Journal ArticleReview

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAISlice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.