Back to all papers

Prospective evaluation of a large language model clinical decision support system in the emergency department.

August 19, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Leibovitch L,Ahituv A,Gorenshtein A,Aran D,Sorka M,Miron K,Shelly S

Affiliations (8)

  • Department of Neurology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
  • Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
  • Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Faculty of Biology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
  • Taub Faculty of Computer Science Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
  • Department of Neurology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. [email protected].
  • Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. [email protected].
  • Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. [email protected].

Abstract

Prospective evidence for artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support in emergency departments remains limited. Here we conducted a DECIDE-AI stage 1 evaluation of SHAKED, a clinical decision support system built on multiple large language models, in a tertiary emergency department. Over 4 weeks, 1,138 patients were analyzed across two parallel units-one using SHAKED and one following routine rotations. Clinical adoption of SHAKED declined from 68% to 30%, owing to workload-sensitive disengagement (OR = 0.72 per shift hour, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.83). Physicians preferred the use of SHAKED for radiology consultations (OR = 2.98, 95% CI 1.58 to 5.63). No adverse events were detected, and expert review rated 99 of 100 sampled outputs as clinically appropriate. Emergency department length of stay did not differ between wings (4.9 h in both, P = 0.99). Intention-to-treat analysis showed a non-significant trend toward shorter consultation cycle time (-9.4 min, P = 0.077). These findings suggest that sustained clinician engagement, rather than algorithmic accuracy, may be the key barrier to effective clinical AI use in emergency departments. They inform randomized trial design but do not justify clinical deployment of AI clinical decision support at this stage. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06902675 .

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.