Back to all papers

Deep learning segmentation of the cerebral ventricular system and brainstem for pediatric radiotherapy planning.

September 19, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Heinzelmann F,Hörst F,Heine L,Fragemann J,Rempe M,Luijten G,Peters S,Hlouschek J,Egger J,Timmermann B,Kleesiek J,Bäumer C

Affiliations (8)

  • West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany.
  • TU Dortmund University, Department of Physics, Dortmund, Germany.
  • West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Medicine, Essen, Germany.
  • Center for Virtual and Extended Reality in Medicine (ZvRM), University Hospital Essen (AöR), Essen, Germany.
  • Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany.

Abstract

Segmentation of the cerebral ventricular system (VS) is central to radiotherapy, both for whole-ventricular irradiation in intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) and protection of the periventricular region. Complex, variable VS anatomy makes manual delineation challenging and hampers auto-segmentation model development. We reported the evaluation and workflow integration of a deep-learning (DL) model for VS and brainstem segmentation on pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). An nnU-Net was trained on MRIs from 76 unique brain tumor cases (<i>n</i> = 73/71 for T1/T2). The evaluation used two independent retrospective cohorts: (i) GCTs evaluated on planning computed tomography (CT) images after MRI-to-CT registration mapping (<i>n</i> = 13/14), and (ii) brain tumors evaluated on MRI (<i>n</i> = 14). Performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distances (HD) against manual contours. Prospective deployment in routine clinical planning assessed usability and workflow integration. In the GCT-CT cohort, brainstem segmentations achieved median DSCs of >0.85 and HDs<sub>95</sub> of ≤5.0/6.4 mm, while VS segmentations achieved DSCs of >0.70 and HDs<sub>95</sub> of ≤5.3/4.3 mm, after rigid/deformable mapping to planning CT. In the MR cohort, performance on T1-/T2-weighted MRI reached DSCs of ≥0.90 for both structures, and HDs<sub>95</sub> of ≤3.0/3.4 mm and ≤ 1.3/2.2 mm for the brainstem and VS, respectively. The DL-segmentation workflow reduced workflow time by >50% compared with manual contouring. Lower performance in the GCT-CT cohort likely reflects noisier CT-based references, interobserver variability, and uncorrected geometric/anatomical mismatch. The model's accuracy supports radiotherapy planning in pediatric brain tumors through risk-structure delineation and target-volume segmentation in GCTs.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAISlice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.