Back to all papers

Development of an artificial intelligence driven dose prediction pipeline for online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy.

July 23, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Tengler B,Schneider M,Nachbar M,Boeke S,Gani C,Niyazi M,Fischer P,Baumgartner CF,Thorwarth D

Affiliations (6)

  • Section for Biomedical Physics. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
  • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.
  • German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Switzerland.
  • Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Switzerland.
  • Cluster of Excellence 'Machine Learning in the Sciences', University of Tübingen, Germany.

Abstract

The closed-off nature of most treatment planning systems (TPS) limits the potential for using artificial intelligence (AI) tools during online adaptive treatments. The aim of this study was to develop an AI-driven pipeline (AutoAdapt) for online planning of adaptive radiotherapy usable in a closed-off setting, providing optimal plan constraints derived from a population-based dose prediction model. The AutoAdapt pipeline consists of a physics-aware Swin UNet transformer network for dose prediction trained on 266 magnetic resonance images from 25 prostate cancer patients treated with 60 Gy on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance linear accelerator. The predicted dose was used to calculate plan constraints that were subsequently fed into a commercial TPS. AutoAdapt was tested using ten unseen cases and compared to manual plans based on clinical objectives, time, and complexity. While all plans were approved by a radiation oncologist, AutoAdapt met all clinical objectives in seven patients compared to ten when manually planned. AutoAdapt yielded a significantly lower D<sub>0.035cm<sup>3</sup></sub> to the rectum (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Manual plans achieved a median rectum V<sub>20Gy</sub> of 44% compared to 51% in AutoAdapt plans (<i>p</i> = 0.02). The pipeline only required a median of 29 s (7.5%) longer than the manual planners. The developed pipeline resulted in high-quality plans, ready for clinical use without further adjustments. AutoAdapt prioritized maximum rectum dose over D<sub>20%</sub> compared to manual planning, while requiring less manual work. In the future, AutoAdapt may be used to assist human planners and improve adaptive radiotherapy workflows.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.