Back to all papers

A Novel AI-Assisted 3D Hybrid Soft and Hard Tissue Model for Peri-implant Diagnosis and Treatment Planning: A Proof-of-Concept Study of Immediate Implant Planning in the Anterior Maxilla.

October 2, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Dawood EA,Papasratorn D,Shelkovyi V,Elgarba BM,Lahoud P,Paganini A,Fontenele RC,Jacobs R

Affiliations (8)

  • OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven; Division of Periodontology & Oral Implantology, Institut de Médecine Dentaire et Stomatologie (IMDS), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Digital Dentistry, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oral Surgery, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven; Department of Stomatology, Public Oral Health and Forensic Dentistry, Division of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: [email protected].

Abstract

Immediate implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone requires precise three-dimensional (3D) positioning within compromised sockets. Conventional planning platforms integrate cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanning (IOS) data but exclude critical parameters such as gingival phenotype and thickness. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a novel patient-specific virtual 3D peri-implant model (PIM) that converts AI-segmented dental hard- and soft-tissue data into a realistic 3D soft- and hard-tissue model for peri-implant diagnosis and treatment planning, fusing AI-segmented CBCT, IOS, and gingival tissue data into a single implant planning framework. Thirty patients requiring tooth extraction and immediate implant placement of a maxillary anterior tooth were retrospectively included. CBCT and IOS datasets were processed through an AI-driven platform to segment teeth, alveolar bone, gingiva, and surrounding structures, which were then integrated into a patient-specific 3D virtual model. Virtual tooth removal created a simulated post-extraction socket, allowing prosthetically driven implant planning. Three specialist clinicians from oral surgery, prosthodontics, and periodontics independently performed implant planning under two conditions: conventional CBCT and IOS alone, and PIM-assisted planning. Inter-operator variability and agreement were evaluated across coronal, apical, and angular dimensions using continuous and ordinal outcome measures. PIM workflow feasibility (successful model generation and implant planning) was 100% (30/30 cases). PIM was associated with lower mean inter-operator deviations for apical (Holm-adjusted p = .009) and angular positioning (Holm-adjusted p < .001), but not coronal positioning (Holm-adjusted p = .10). Major angular deviations decreased from 40.0% to 6.7% of implants (Holm-adjusted p = .028), with no categorical difference for coronal or apical deviation. Converting AI-segmented dental hard- and soft-tissue data into a realistic hybrid 3D tissue model was feasible and significantly reduced mean apical and angular inter-operator deviations, with the ordinal benefit most evident for angular positioning. These findings support further prospective evaluation of the PIM workflow. By fusing bony and gingival characteristics into a single realistic 3D digital tissue model, PIM may support more informed decisions regarding implant position, grafting, abutment selection, emergence profile design, and restorative planning before surgery.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAISlice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.