Back to all papers

Association of Left Atrial Intramyocardial Fat Infiltration With Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence After Pulsed-Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

October 22, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Fukushima T,Yanagisawa S,Miyazawa H,Tanaka Y,Kitahara T,Hiramatsu S,Hiramatsu T,Adachi K,Teraoka T,Ota R,Shimojo M,Tsuji Y,Inden Y,Murohara T

Affiliations (2)

  • Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Advanced Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. Electronic address: [email protected].

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT)-derived left atrial intramyocardial fat infiltration (inFAT) is an emerging imaging phenotype of the atrial substrate in atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to evaluate inFAT and peri-left atrial epicardial adipose tissue (LA-EAT) using artificial intelligence-based CT analysis software (ADAS 3D) and to assess their association with atrial arrhythmia recurrence after persistent AF ablation. This retrospective single-center study included 59 patients who underwent pulsed-field ablation for persistent AF. inFAT and LA-EAT were quantified using a semi-automated algorithm. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of inFAT and LA-EAT with recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed after stratification according to the tertile of each parameter. During a median follow-up period of 11.2 [6.4-11.9] months, atrial arrhythmia recurrence occurred in 21 (36%) patients. The inFAT volume was significantly greater in patients with recurrence than those without (1.25 [0.78-1.53] vs. 0.72 [0.45-1.09] cm<sup>3</sup>, p=0.021). In contrast, LA-EAT volume was comparable between the groups (21.8 [13.7-30.4] vs. 17.5 [14.1-26.8] cm<sup>3</sup>, p=0.419). In Cox regression analysis, higher inFAT was significantly associated with recurrence, whereas LA-EAT was not significantly associated (inFAT: hazard ratio [HR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-3.27; p=0.015; LA-EAT: HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06; p=0.227). The significant association between inFAT and recurrence remained consistent after adjustment for body mass index. Greater inFAT volume was associated with atrial arrhythmia recurrence after pulsed-field ablation for persistent AF, suggesting that inFAT may represent a candidate imaging marker of recurrence risk.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAISlice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.