Vertebral body segmentation in CT: An open dataset, deep-learning models and comparison to existing models.
Authors
Affiliations (5)
Affiliations (5)
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
Vertebral bodies are anatomical landmarks for localizing measurements in applications such as body composition analysis. This study aimed to provide open-access vertebral body labels and deep-learning segmentation models, and to compare their performance in identifying the third lumbar vertebra (L3) with existing solutions. Thoracic and lumbar vertebral body labels were created for 1460 CT scans from two public datasets. Two residual-encoder nnU-Net models were trained on 1216 cases, and a two-step pipeline was developed. Segmentation performance was tested on 244 cases. In an independent oncological dataset of 300 cases, three readers manually annotated L3 landmarks. Labeling performance was assessed using signed and absolute center localization error (cranio-caudal distance between predicted and annotated L3 center) and center hit rate (predicted center within annotated vertebral body), followed by a comparison with existing models. The two models and the two-step pipeline achieved Dice scores of 0.962 [95% CI, 0.941 to 0.978], 0.939 [95% CI, 0.907 to 0.965], and 0.953 [95% CI, 0.926 to 0.974] for segmentation of the L3 vertebral body. Center hit rates were similarly high across models. Signed center localization error did not differ significantly, whereas absolute center localization error was lower for VertebralBodiesL and VertebralBodiesStepwise than for the vertebral-body-specific TotalSegmentator pipeline. SPINEPS / VERIDAH results are reported separately because vertebral definitions differed. The proposed models accurately segment thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies and reliably identify L3. Labels, model weights, and a body composition analysis pipeline are openly available.