Multimodal deep learning for predicting unsuccessful recanalization in refractory large vessel occlusion.
Authors
Affiliations (3)
Affiliations (3)
- Stroke Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Stroke Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- Stroke Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
This study explores a multi-modal deep learning approach that integrates pre-intervention neuroimaging and clinical data to predict endovascular therapy (EVT) outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. To this end, consecutive stroke patients undergoing EVT were included in the study, including patients with suspected Intracranial Atherosclerosis-related Large Vessel Occlusion ICAD-LVO and other refractory occlusions. A retrospective, single-center cohort of patients with anterior circulation LVO who underwent EVT between 2017-2023 was analyzed. Refractory LVO (rLVO) defined class, comprised patients who presented any of the following: final angiographic stenosis > 50 %, unsuccessful recanalization (eTICI 0-2a) or required rescue treatments (angioplasty +/- stenting). Neuroimaging data included non-contrast CT and CTA volumes, automated vascular segmentation, and CT perfusion parameters. Clinical data included demographics, comorbidities and stroke severity. Imaging features were encoded using convolutional neural networks and fused with clinical data using a DAFT module. Data were split 80 % for training (with four-fold cross-validation) and 20 % for testing. Explainability methods were used to analyze the contribution of clinical variables and regions of interest in the images. The final sample comprised 599 patients; 481 for training the model (77, 16.0 % rLVO), and 118 for testing (16, 13.6 % rLVO). The best model predicting rLVO using just imaging achieved an AUC of 0.53 ± 0.02 and F1 of 0.19 ± 0.05 while the proposed multimodal model achieved an AUC of 0.70 ± 0.02 and F1 of 0.39 ± 0.02 in testing. Combining vascular segmentation, clinical variables, and imaging data improved prediction performance over single-source models. This approach offers an early alert to procedural complexity, potentially guiding more tailored, timely intervention strategies in the EVT workflow.