Back to all papers

CCTA without ECG Leads Using Whole-Heart Motion Correction Algorithm Based on Wide-Detector CT.

August 4, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Zhao C,Wang Z,Dong S,Bu J,Zheng C,Chao W,Lu J

Affiliations (4)

  • Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100053 Beijing, China (C.Z., C.Z., W.C., J.L.).
  • Department of Radiology, Xiongan Xuanwu Hospital, 070001 Xiongan New Area, China (Z.W., J.B.).
  • Department of Medical Engineering, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100053 Beijing, China (S.D.); Department of Medical Engineering, Xiongan Xuanwu Hospital, 070001 Xiongan New Area, China (S.D.).
  • Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100053 Beijing, China (C.Z., C.Z., W.C., J.L.). Electronic address: [email protected].

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of a whole heart motion correction algorithm on image quality and interpretability in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) without ECG leads. Seventy patients with acute chest pain underwent CCTA without ECG leads examination. Images were reconstructed with standard (STD), coronary vessel tracking motion correction (Snapshot Freeze 1, SSF1), and whole‑heart motion correction (Snapshot Freeze 2, SSF2) algorithms. Additionally, all three groups underwent deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm. Objective evaluation, including noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Subjective image quality was scored by two radiologists using a 5 - point Likert scale. Interpretability of coronary vessels was assessed per segment, vessel, and patient. SSF2 significantly reduced noise and improved SNR/CNR compared to STD and SSF1 (all P < .05). Subjective scores were highest for SSF2 (median 5.0 vs 4.0 for SSF1 and 3.0 for STD, P < .001), with inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.87). SSF2 achieved higher interpretability for proximal/mid-segments (99.6%) and improved distal/small-branch interpretability (97.2% vs 89.4% for SSF1, P < .017). Patient-level interpretability reached 100% with SSF2, vs 92.9% (SSF1) and 51.4% (STD). SSF2 enhances image quality and interpretability in CCTA without ECG leads, and exhibits favorable in the visualization of distal vessels and small branches.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.