Back to all papers

Cardiac Image Segmentation Under Respiratory Motion Artifacts Using Different Modified U-Net Models.

October 23, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Singh RP,Nagabhooshanam N,Thakur Y,Jadhav A,Kumar CR,Lakshmi GV,Rajaram A,Almubarak HA

Affiliations (9)

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, 281406, India.
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aditya University, Surampalem, Andhra Pradesh, 533437, India.
  • Department of Research Analytics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, IES College of Technology, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, 462044, India.
  • Department of Computing Science and Artificial Intelligence, NIMS Institute of Engineering & Technology, NIMS University Rajasthan, Jaipur, 303121, India.
  • Department of Physics, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Department of Computer Science, Aditya Degree & P.G. College (A), Kakinada, India.
  • Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, E.G.S. Pillay Engineering College, Nagapattinam, Tamilnadu, 611002, India.
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Bihar Engineering University, India, Patna. [email protected].

Abstract

Precise segmentation of cardiac magnetic resonance images (CMR) is essential to quantitative measurements of the heart, yet it is often affected by respiratory motion misregistration's and this is particularly common in free-breathing patient environments. These artifacts reduce the quality of the image and present a big challenge to traditional deep learning models such as the baseline U-Net. This paper carries out a systematic evaluation of the capabilities of four alternate U-Net architectures, Attention U-Net, Dense U-Net, Residual U-Net and Sharp U-Net, on CMR data with synthetically added motion artifacts of various intensities. To add synthetic artifacts, the deformation fields were employed that mimic the realistic breathing-induced deformations and obtained the clean, mild, moderate, and severe moving conditions. Hybrid loss function that combines Dice, Focal, and Tversky losses was used to train each model to create robustness to class imbalance and boundary degradation. The segmentation quality was assessed by the following evaluation metrics: Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD) and Jaccard Index (JI). Their results show that Sharp U-Net had the best overall performance with the highest average DSC (0.927) and lowest HD (3.62 mm) in severe motion conditions. The region centered attention mechanisms were also capable of withstanding these in Attention U-Net. The dense and Residual U-Nets did not perform much better than the baseline, and did not perform as well when there were severe artifacts. These results show the significance of architectural improvements and motion consciousness instruction strategies in guaranteeing the dependable segmentation. The article provides a scalable and reproducible methodology to assess the performance of motion-robust deep learning models for CMR and adaptable for use in other clinical diagnostic applications where respiratory gating is not available. The proposed framework provides a reproducible and computationally practical approach to motion-robust cardiac MRI segmentation. Sharp U-Net achieved the highest segmentation performance under severe respiratory motion, with a DSC of 0.784, compared with 0.778 for Attention U-Net, while requiring a slightly higher inference latency of approximately 28-30 ms per 256 × 256 slice and GPU memory consumption of approximately 1.8 GB. This modest computational overhead represents a trade-off between improved boundary preservation and computational efficiency and should be considered when deploying the model in resource-constrained clinical environments. Across the clean, mild, moderate, and severe respiratory motion conditions, Sharp U-Net achieved an average DSC of 0.927. Under the most challenging severe-motion condition, the DSC decreased to 0.784, while maintaining an ASSD of 1.69 mm, sensitivity of 0.823, precision of 0.774, and RVE of 8.9%.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAISlice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.