Back to all papers

Limited incremental value and cross-cohort transferability of CT radiomics for survival prediction after TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma.

October 13, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Bartnik K,Tsevegmed B

Affiliations (3)

  • Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. [email protected].
  • Centre for Credible Artificial Intelligence, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland. [email protected].
  • Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Abstract

To evaluate whether pretreatment CT radiomics adds information for overall survival (OS) prediction among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and assess frozen imaging-model performance in an independent cohort. This retrospective study included 221 WAW-TACE and 98 HCC-TACE-SEG patients with pretreatment arterial and portal venous CT. Incremental value of a tumor-radiomics Random Survival Forest score (R1) beyond cohort-specific clinical Cox models (C0) was evaluated within each cohort using 5-fold cross-validation repeated 10 times. External validation was restricted to frozen WAW-trained R1 models (Top-K = 5, 10, 15) applied to HCC-TACE-SEG without refitting; the combined C0 + R1 model was not externally validated. WAW-TACE included 162 deaths and HCC-TACE-SEG 86 deaths. In WAW-TACE, C0, R1 Top-K = 15, and C0 + R1 achieved C-indices of 0.646 ± 0.043, 0.593 ± 0.049, and 0.639 ± 0.045, respectively. Corresponding HCC-TACE-SEG estimates were 0.496 ± 0.087, 0.530 ± 0.072, and 0.495 ± 0.094. Thus, R1 did not consistently improve cohort-specific clinical reference models. In frozen external application, Top-K = 5, 10, and 15 achieved C-indices of 0.463 (95% CI 0.397-0.532), 0.535 (0.468-0.608), and 0.528 (0.460-0.598), respectively. The evaluated models showed no consistent incremental value for OS prediction within these TACE cohorts and limited frozen-model discrimination in the clinically distinct HCC-TACE-SEG cohort. These findings do not support clinical use of these models or establish a general limitation of CT radiomics.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAISlice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.