Brain cone-beam CT image quality improvement using a deep-learning-based denoising method: a multicenter retrospective study.
Authors
Affiliations (9)
Affiliations (9)
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. [email protected].
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. [email protected].
- RADIS Lab, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France.
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Philips (Germany), Hamburg, Germany.
- Philips (Netherlands), Best, Netherlands.
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) denoising may improve cone-beam CT (CBCT) image quality for point-of-care stroke assessment in the interventional suite. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a DL-based denoising algorithm on objective and subjective image quality in brain CBCT using both standard circular and advanced dual-axis trajectories. We retrospectively analyzed 20 noncontrast brain CBCT acquisitions (Karolinska: 10 standard circular; St Michael's: 10 dual-axis). A DL-based denoising algorithm was applied at three strengths (Minimal, Medium, High) and compared to standard images with no additional denoising. Objective metrics (noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), artifact indices) were measured using standardized ROIs. Six experts rated subjective image quality on 5-point Likert scales. Paired tests with Bonferroni correction were used for comparisons. High-level DL denoising significantly improved all objective metrics (noise, SNR, CNR, artifact indices) for both thin and thick slices (all p<.001). It doubled gray-white matter CNR (thin slices: 2.31 vs. 1.08), reduced noise, and improved subcalvarial and posterior fossa artifact indices. Subjectively, high-level denoising yielded higher median ratings for noise, texture, sharpness, brain parenchyma visualization, CSF spaces, and confidence in assessing ischemia and hemorrhage (all p<.001). Improvements were consistent for both acquisition techniques, and perceived artifact severity did not differ (p>.99). Inter-reader agreement was substantial. The DL-based denoising algorithm significantly improved objective and subjective brain CBCT image-quality; no difference in perceived artifact severity was detected. These findings support further evaluation of deep learning-enhanced CBCT denoising for brain imaging in the interventional suite.