Back to all papers

Non-Invasive Assessment of Perineural Invasion Density: A Novel Marker for Prognosis and Treatment Stratification in Prostate Cancer.

October 31, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Liu B,Zhang L,Zhu W,Yang M,Liu X,Li X,Qin P,Lin Z,Cai Q,Zheng J,Zhao X,Zou C,Wen X,Xu L,Wu D,Zhang L,Zhang C,Li K,Wang C,Zhong W,Luo Y

Affiliations (6)

  • Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Department of Urology, Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
  • Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  • Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Abstract

We established and validated perineural invasion density (PNID) as a superior prognostic marker and developed an MRI-based AI model for its preoperative prediction. In this multicenter study of 1091 PCa patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, we evaluated PNID's association with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). We also analyzed concurrent β-blocker or antimuscarinic use with adjuvant ADT. A deep learning model was developed in a primary cohort (n = 523) and validated in two external cohorts (n = 317, 251). High-PNID was an independent prognostic factor for BCR (HR 4.06, 95% CI: 2.75-5.97, P < 0.001) and rPFS (HR 4.61, 95% CI: 2.97-7.16, P < 0.001). Notably, concurrent β-blocker use was significantly associated with favorable BCR outcomes exclusively in the High-PNID subgroup (HR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.12-0.84, P = 0.021), with no benefit in the Non-High PNID population or with antimuscarinics. The AI model showed excellent performance predicting High-PNID, with AUCs of 0.917 (training), 0.842 (internal validation), 0.889 and 0.915 (external validations). Model-identified High-PNID patients had significantly worse outcomes. PNID surpasses traditional PNI in prognostic accuracy and identifies a high-risk phenotype. High-PNID may define a subgroup benefiting from adjuvant β-blocker therapy, providing an exploratory clinical rationale for targeting the nerve-tumor microenvironment in stratified subpopulations. Hence, this model may be a reliable, non-invasive tool for preoperative identification of this high-risk subgroup, aiding clinicians in personalized risk stratification and treatment planning.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAISlice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.