Back to all papers

Preoperative Prediction of Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Integrating Multimodal Ultrasound and Clinical Data: A Multicenter Study

September 21, 2026arxiv logopreprint

Authors

Jun Cheng,Yuanyuan Kong,Qing Huang,Xiaotong Tan,Licong Dong,Yulong Han,Wufeng Xue,Ruobing Huang,Dong Ni,Qi Yang,Jie Yu,Ping Liang

Abstract

Background: Microvascular invasion (MVI) predicts recurrence and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but requires postoperative histopathology for diagnosis. We developed and validated a model integrating multimodal ultrasound and clinical data for preoperative MVI prediction. Methods: This multicenter study included 489 patients with HCC from eight centers. All patients had B-mode ultrasound (BUS), color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US), and clinical information. Data from seven centers (n = 421) were used for model development with five-fold cross-validation; data from the remaining center (n = 68) formed an independent external validation cohort. The proposed multimodal information fusion network used modality-specific encoders, a hemodynamic temporal change module for bidirectional DCE-US perfusion changes, and a representation consistency learning module to align heterogeneous ultrasound representations before Transformer-based fusion. Results: In external validation, DCE-US achieved the highest single-modality area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC; 0.8545+/-0.0198), versus clinical information (0.6715+/-0.0156), CDFI (0.6435+/-0.0344), and BUS (0.6087+/-0.0417). Pixel-difference sampling and the proposed temporal module outperformed alternative sampling and video representation methods. The full model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.8953+/-0.0180, accuracy of 81.18%+/-2.83%, sensitivity of 86.40%+/-6.69%, and specificity of 78.14%+/-6.28. Conclusions: Integrating multimodal ultrasound and clinical information enabled promising preoperative MVI prediction in HCC. DCE-US was the main source of predictive information, while BUS, CDFI, and clinical information provided complementary value. The proposed framework may support preoperative risk stratification and individualized clinical decision-making.

Topics

cs.CV

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAISlice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.