Back to all papers

Multimodal Deep Learning for Uncertainty-Aware Radiation Pneumonitis Risk Prediction

August 28, 2026arxiv logopreprint

Authors

Jin Yang,Tian Liu,Jing Wang,Robert Samstein,Kenneth Rosenzweig,Julie Bloom,Ming Chao

Abstract

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a common and clinically significant toxicity of thoracic radiation therapy that can cause pulmonary morbidity and impair quality of life. Although conventional dose-volume histogram-based metrics and normal tissue complication probability models are widely used for RP risk assessment, they inadequately capture the complex spatial, anatomical, and patient-specific factors underlying radiation-induced lung injury. Recent machine learning approaches have improved RP risk prediction by integrating multimodal clinical and imaging information; however, most provide a point risk estimate without quantifying the reliability of individual predictions, limiting their potential clinical utility. We propose a Multimodal Bayesian Diffusion Transformer (MM-DiT) framework that jointly estimates RP risk and characterizes the sources of predictive uncertainty. MM-DiT integrates planning computed tomography (CT) images and three-dimensional radiation dose distributions through self-supervised multimodal pre-training, reducing reliance on limited and potentially noisy toxicity labels. The resulting representations are further refined using a latent diffusion transformer and transferred to a Bayesian prediction framework for probabilistic RP risk estimation. A learnable label-noise model is incorporated to explicitly account for uncertainty arising from imperfect toxicity annotations. Therefore, it provides individualized RP risk estimates with complementary measures of aleatoric, epistemic, and label uncertainty, enabling assessment of prediction reliability at the individual-patient level. We evaluated MM-DiT in two independent cohorts using complementary assessments of predictive discrimination, calibration, and uncertainty. The results demonstrate its potential to provide accurate RP risk estimates while quantifying clinically relevant sources of predictive uncertainty.

Topics

eess.IV

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.